Parliamentary sovereignty Essay

Critically discuss this statement.A.V Dicey gives an introduction to the precept of parliamentary reign as, the principle of sevensary sovereignty means uncomplete more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament therefore defined has, under the side of meat paper, the right to make or unmake any right any(prenominal) and, further, that no person or body is appreciate by the legal philosophy of England as having the right to override or set aside the edict of Parliament. However, in that location are many discussions as to whether the UK joining with the European Union and adherence to the Human Rights Act 1998 renders sovereignty irrelevant. It will be argued that although following these rules may appear to be contradictory to sovereignty, co-operation is entirely unforced, necessary, and there are many examples as to why sovereignty is not irrelevant, nor archaic. Firstly, Parliamentary sovereignty is not a fundamental relic. It may seem to be the, as part of the UK c onstitution continues to rely on extremely primordial Acts such as The Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights Act , however, these edicts continue to remain as they set out important constitutional principles.Even since 1215, it has been recognised that it is important to square up the power of the monarch, and transfer powers to parliament, in interest of balance, and the judicial separation of powers. Up until present daylight, supporting Diceys summary above, UK courts cannot need down an Act of Parliament, this is unlike many Supreme Courts in other(a) countries, for example the USA, who are spring to reject polity which contradicts the written constitutional rights. For example in the case of Mortensen v. Peters , it notes that in the event of a contradiction in terms between international law and Act of Parliament, courts within the UK are bound to apply the UK legislation, and discount the international law.This shows that, while Parliamentary sovereignty is base on anc ient fundamental principles, it still has a modern, every day importance, which is key to our constitution, as supported by Jennings The supremacy of Parliament is the constitution. The doctrine of legislative sovereignty dictates thatparliament has power to legislate on constitutional matters, thus parliament can change the constitution by an routine of parliament.There is a challenge posed to parliamentary sovereignty by EU law, as in 1973 the UK joined the European Union. particle states must not be permitted to deviate from EU rules common to all, thus overriding Parliamentary sovereignty. This seems to conflict with Diceys contemplate of sovereignty. The European Communities Act 1972 tries to establish the relationship between domestic law and EU law Any enactment passed or to be passed shall be construed and keep up effect subject to the foregoing provisions of this section. This provides a line of work with sovereignty, as it means that the UK will have to adhere to th e EU court, kinda than our own supreme court. Parliament in the future may no longish be considered as sovereign, as they may no longer be free to make or unmake law. However, courts have tried and true to find a middle ground with EU and Parliamentary sovereignty, in the case of Macarthys .Lord Denning stats that if Parliament every clearly and deliberately passes an act which is inconsistent with EU law, the duty of our courts to follow the statute of our Parliament. This shows that Parliament has retained some of its independence, and only acts in accord with EU voluntarily, and because the UK agrees with the EU laws. Leading on from the UKs voluntary cooperation with the EU laws, is the case of Factortame (No. 2) . exculpation for the decision in Factortame was offered by Lord Bridge, which emphasised that whatever confinement of its sovereignty Parliament accepted when it enacted the European Communities Act 1972 was entirely voluntary the ECA 1972 was the domestic source o f the supremacy of EU law and there was zip fastener novel about this decision.Lord Bridges speech traces the source of the limit of legislative power to the ECA 1972, suggesting that if Parliament wishes to create a new Act, contradicting EU law, it need only expressly state in the new statute that it is to take place regardless of the ECA 1972. This, supported by Dennings Obiter in Macarthys , brings us in a compete circle, to Diceys view that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament, as it suggests that the UK can decide not to follow EU law, therefore Parliamentary sovereignty is not obsolete or irrelevant.