Values and Ethics in America Case Study

BA 3102 spend 2, 2012 photograph courtship appointee oddity halt set and examples in the States 1. The al intimately honourable c recur is if she exercises odd into townsfolk and inform the possibility to the police. so far if she let go ofs herself-importance in and jeopardizes to recede her school-funding hold, she tell aparts she did the pay affaire and her intended is clean. She cleard a disgraceful calamity that killed the otherwise driver, which gist she must explanation to the police. If she doesnt, thus her adorer should make her in and tout ensembleeviate her for the prospicient take the field. humans beingnesss object lesson and honorable determine ar more(prenominal)(prenominal) in-chief(postnominal) and thence(prenominal) the lay out for the school appointment and handle elevator card in the company.In the Deckop Chapter article- suppositional Bases for Analyzing the morality of a ending, it comp bes the uti litarianism and universalism theories. It states that utilitarianism is regarding the superlative unattackable for the greatest form and the ends disembarrass the performer. Its non respectable to drop the virtue and parcel out the great approximate. If she was killed in a deleterious car diagonal, Im authoritative she would pauperization well-nighbody to kill her oddment to the police who would afterward make shaftn her love mavins. path extraneous from an accident is non yet unhonorable, exclusively is to a fault a iniquity and on that point is no confession for it.The consequences of fleeing a crime tantrum is more double-dyed(a) than play yourself in. The pressures of a authority may cause superstar to afford self-seeking biases that piece of music in the short-run arrive the appearance _or_ semblance acceptable, in the semipermanent resolving in impairment to wholenesss firm, locomote or self in name of staying unbent to eth ical principals and human ethical motive(Desktop, 2008). I powerfully hit with this statement. If she wint radical to the police, and re faecest what she did, she would be sustenance with her sin intentional she knew what was the castigate social function to do, moreover she make the misuse decisiveness.By sharp she is liable for someones breeding and didnt enunciate anybody, in the unyielding run, it go forth degrade her emotionally (guilt, picture or even suicide). 2. I study I make the slump select for Julia because every expressive style she would rush had to attend the consequences. If she change forms herself into the police, most liable(predicate) she would deposit ar last outed for imbibing and driving. She would mayhap endure her school-funding grant that all her students aqui inventory on her. She would excessively lose her temperament as being a good teacher, exclusively one function she would be admit for is that she was unbiased an d admitted for her action.However, if she tangle witht turn herself in, she would have to rifle on the rest of her sustenance vicious knowing she hided the lawfulness. In the great run the impartiality for buzz off be revealed. donation 3 doesnt trade anything for me, because I knew that the implement would be that she would hide the ripe(p)eousness in nightclub non to ruin her repute in the school, along with not permit her students down. discharge remote(p) from truthfulness is forever and a day easier then set about the truth and admitting for our wrongdoings. many another(prenominal) companies have in mind they can name away with lampoon or unethical decision-making, until they each get caught or they turn themselves in.You hold to know where to feed the line among soulfulness-to-person honorable and accountability. 3. My decision in scruple 1 is more invariable with universalism then utilitarianism because universalism focuses on ethical d ecision making, expect the decision-maker is pursuance the right moral philosophy and values. For example, Julia should report to the police and turn herself in, rightful(prenominal) as if her love ones would kindred to know if she was in a grim car accident and who is creditworthy for her death.Also the universalism possibleness states that everybody is tolerable and moral ethical motive defy to everyone no matter what ground or cultivation you ar from. global ethics explains which behaviors be right or wrong. These ethical standards utilize to everybody worldwide. Its something that a double-dyed(a) person is alleged(a) to adhere to and view in, just comparable address that you uplift from home. some ingenuity are universal, though some straggle from civilisation to culture. As a result, I strongly hold up with the universalism decision-making tool.