Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism - Essay ExampleBelow is another fictional character of judicial activism, in which a enlighten district had its policies overturned by the court. This should be considered to be activism, as the educate district is not allowed by the court to pass policies for itself that would help remedy individual fictional characters of discrimination. However, since this case cases involves reverse discrimination, this case would not be decried by the conservatives who typically decry judicial activism. A. Parents Involved in Community domesticates v. Seattle School District, 551 U.S. 701 (2007). Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, 551 U.S. 701 (2007) is an equal protection case argued sooner the court in 2007. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court. This case dealt with two different crop districts, the Seattle educate district in Washington State and the Jeffer parole County school district in Louisville, Kentucky. Each school district used race as a way to assign assimilators to their schools. The Seattle school district allowed 9th graders to choose the schools that they wanted to attend. If too many scholarly persons wanted to attend a particular school, then that school used a series of tie-breakers to determine who would attend that school. One of the tie-breakers is the race of the student in the Seattle school district, 41% of students overall are tweed, and 59% are non-white. If a particular school did not keep down within 10% of the 41/59 split say a school was 60% white and 40% non-white then race was used to fill the available slots at that particular school, so that it would be brought into match. Seattle operates the school in this way to address the racially identifiable housing patterns on school assignments. volt different schools in the Seattle district used this method of assigning students to their schools, elevating racial characteristics ab ove other merits. The supplicant parents filed suit on behalf of their children who were denied a spot at the five schools because of their race. The Ninth Circuit Court of appeals indomitable in an en banc decision that this the school district presented a compelling state interest, achieving racial balance within schools, and that the school districts methods of achieving this racial balance was narrowly tailored, thus upholding the school districts method of apportioning students to these schools. Jefferson County prevalent Schools had a similar scheme. Their school district is composed of approximately 34 black students, and 66 share white students. All non-magnet schools in the district were required to enroll a minimum 15 share and maximum of 50 percent black students. If a certain school was not within this range, students would be denied a spot at that particular school based on that students race. So, if a black student wanted to enroll in School A, and that school had already reached its 50 maximum of black students, that student would be denied a spot at that school. If a white student wanted to go to School B, and that school was less than 15% black, then that student would be denied a spot at that school. prayer Crystal Meredith sought to enroll her son at a school that was close to her house, but her son was denied a spot at that school because her son would have caused that school to be racially